Which used plastics is this recycling method particularly suitable for?
Edl: We focus on polyolefins; specifically, polyethylene, polypropylene and polystyrene – those have the highest market share of plastics. We do not want to interfere with established mechanical recycling routes and therefore focus on hard-to-recycle plastics that are currently not covered by any recycling activities, for example due to high contamination levels. Today, these waste streams are going to incineration. In comparison to mechanical recycling, which requests mono-streams, chemical recycling can process mixed plastic fractions as well – with our ReOil plants we focus on 2D mixed plastic waste fractions like foils.
What are the environmental benefits of chemical recycling?
Edl: Last year we conducted a life-cycle-assessment that compares chemical recycling with the current end-of-life route incineration. For 2030, this LCA shows that 34 percent of greenhouse gas emissions could be saved if the waste streams, which currently go to incineration, are chemically recycled using ReOil.
This shows that chemical recycling, as an additional technology to existing recycling processes, can make a valuable contribution to reaching our climate targets. The OMV Group also has mechanical recycling plants in its portfolio – we see the added value in the complementary use of different recycling technologies. Chemical recycling has the potential to close the existing gap in circular economy, by recycling waste streams that are not feasible for mechanical recycling and are therefore currently incinerated.
Where does OMV obtain the necessary material flows?
Edl: Regarding the sourcing of feedstock, we are working together with waste companies both in Austria and neighboring countries. Why are we also sourcing feedstock outside of Austria? As said, we do not want to compete with mechanical recyclers. This and the size of the future ReOil plant calls for a broader geographical scope for feedstock sourcing.